USDA acted improperly in denying claims filed under Crop Disaster Program

|
Roger McEowen

The USDA denied the plaintiffs’ applications for federal disaster assistance triggered by freeze damage to citrus crops.  The trial court granted summary judgment for the USDA, but that judgment was vacated on appeal because, with respect to two of the three plaintiffs, the defendant acted arbitrarily and capriciously in denying their claims for relief under the 2000 Crop Disaster Program.  Mahon v. United States Department of Agriculture, 485 F. 3d 1247 (11th Cir. 2007).

The Center for Agricultural Law and Taxation does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. The Center's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.