Iowa Court Says an Appeal is the Exclusive Remedy to Challenge Drainage District Assessment
On January 12, 2022, the Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed that a group of landowners did not follow the required statutory appeal route to challenge a drainage assessment. After a county drainage district assessed the cost of a failed annexation against landowners in the district, the landowners filed a petition for declaratory judgment. Because the landowners did not file an appeal as required under Iowa Code section 468.83(1), the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the landowners’ petition for failure to state a claim.
Appealing Drainage District Assessments
Landowners may challenge an assessment by a drainage district by appealing to the district court. See Iowa Code § 468.83(1). Here, the landowners argued that they sought equitable relief to void an illegal assessment and, accordingly, Iowa Code section 468.83 did not apply. The court rejected this argument finding that the statutory appeal process is the only remedy for aggrieved parties to challenge an assessment. Iowa Code § 468.96.
The court differentiated the current case from Voogd v. Joint Drainage Dist., on which the landowners relied. 188 N.W.2d 387, (Iowa 1971). In Voodg, the Iowa Supreme Court allowed an independent suit to proceed where “the proceedings [were] not merely irregular but [were] void.” In this case, the landowners did not allege that the trustees’ actions would render the proceeding void. Therefore, because the landowners did not follow the statutory appeal route required under chapter 468, the court affirmed the dismissal.
The Center for Agricultural Law and Taxation does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. The Center's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.