Yursik v. Inland Crop Dusters, Inc., et al., No. CV-F-11-01602-LJO-JLT, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132275 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2011)

(case involves crop damage to plaintiff’s almond orchard purportedly caused by defendant’s application of fungicide to the orchard; plaintiff claims that pesticide not applied according to label in violation of FIFRA and state law, and that defendant knowingly and intentionally failed to report damages to prevent investigation and avoid discipline; defendant’s motion to strike word “intentionally” from plaintiff’s complaint denied, as was defendant’s request to strike language from complaint that defendant’s failure to notify governmental agencies was intentional failure to act in direct disregard of plaintiff’s rights). 

CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.

RSS​ Facebook Twitter