Yates, et al. v. Kemp, 979 N.E.2d 678 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012)

(defendant built earthen berm for use as shooting range in 1962 at time when no county zoning rules or state laws governed shooting ranges; range expanded over years, the last time in 2006; in 2008, defendant received permission to continue operation of range; plaintiffs moved to adjacent properties in 1995 and 2006 and brought nuisance action for noise from range; trial court granted summary judgment for defendant; on appeal, court noted that IN Code Sec. 14-22-31.5-6 provided safe harbor for owners and operators of shooting ranges against noise pollution claims, but that provision inapplicable because shooting range not subject to any state or local requirements at time of creation; question of fact created as to whether defendant's operation of shooting range substantially interfered with plaintiffs' use and enjoyment of their property (characterized by the court as inconvenience, annoyance or discomfort; trial court's award of summary judgment for defendant reversed). 

CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.

RSS​ Facebook Twitter