Wheeler et al. v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp., 591 F.3d 355 (5th Cir. 2009)

(purpose of PSA is to protect competition; thus, only those practices that will likely affect competition adversely violate the PSA; fact that another grower given contract on favorable terms not violative of PSA unless plaintiff establishes that competition adversely impacted).

CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.

RSS​ Facebook Twitter