Western Watersheds Project, et al. v. Kraayenbrink, et al., 632 F.3d 472 (9th Cir. 2011)

(proposed amendments to 2006 grazing regulations on federal land put new limitations on BLM's enforcement powers and increased ranchers' ownership rights to improvements and water on public lands (as a result of BLM's historic loss in the Hage litigation); plaintiff (anti-grazing activist organization) challenged regulations on basis that BLM violated NEPA by failing to take required "hard look" at environmental effects of revised regulations, failed to consult with USFWS as required by ESA, and violated FLMPA in promulgating 2006 regulations; trial court granted summary judgment to plaintiff and defendants appealed; trial court decision affirmed - BLM violated NEPA and ESA in adopting 2006 amendments, and also affirmed trial court's permanent injunction enjoining BLM regulations of 2006; because trial court did not consider plaintiff's FLPMA claim, trial court's grant of summary judgment on that point vacated and case remanded on that point for further consideration). 

CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.

RSS​ Facebook Twitter