(issue was whether government’s experts’ opinions regarding whether river branch was “water of the United States” should be excluded; defendants were charged with violating Clean Water Act, making false statements, and obstruction of justice in discharge of hog waste case; issue was whether expert testimony would assist the jury in its determination; court held that expert was not permitted to “opine” as to whether river branch was “water of the United States” or whether it possesses “significant nexus” with nearby waters; both terms are legal conclusions and would “impermissibly invade” province of jury by telling jury what result to reach).
CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.