(competing summary judgment motions regarding confirmation of arbitration award; controversy arose from crop insurance for nursery; after claim made, insurance company determined plaintiff did not satisfy requirements for federal crop insurance; company canceled policies and returned premiums; arbitrator held others had risk and interest in crop, but determined award should be equal to plaintiff’s risk, which was his salary and made an award for the same; plaintiff appealed seeking vacatur of the award and additional damages; court confirmed award holding no evidence arbitrator exceeded his powers or interpreted the policy in a way that stepped beyond his scope of authority).