- Ag Docket
The petitioner operated a business in which he trained telephone representatives and also he also practiced law. He also conducted an airplane rental activity which the court found was unrelated to the telephone activity. The court, agreeing with the IRS, disallowed the flying deductions against the income from the telephone business activity. The petitioner also failed to establish that he had devoted sufficient hours to the airplane activity to satisfy the material participation tests under the passive loss rules - either the 500-hour test or the 100-hour test. The court noted that the petitioner had failed to keep records of the time spent on the airplane activity. The court also upheld the IRS-imposed negligence penalty and underreporting penalty. Williams v. Comr., T.C. Memo. 2014-158.
CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.