(water agreement executed on property as part of loan process; for 12 years, plaintiff received all water it needed from well pursuant to water agreement; defendant attempted to terminate water agreement after dispute with plaintiff; court held plaintiff entitled to water from well for any purpose without interference; on appeal, court held water agreement created appurtenant easement rather than merely a license; court also held that easement allowed for development of plaintiff’s property, so use was not limited to one property; judgment affirmed).