Summers, et al. v. Earth Island Institute, et al., 555 U.S. 488 (2009)

(plaintiff environmental groups lack standing to challenge "salvage timber" sales by USFS; 1992 law required USFS to subject forest land projects to notice and comment, but USFS decided to not submit projects with minimal environmental impact to notice and comment procedures; plaintiffs sued and Ninth Circuit allowed case to proceed on basis that plaintiffs had right to provide input on environmental impact of logging and timber sales on 238 acres of burned forest land; Supreme Court reversed, noting the plaintiffs could not show the logging or sales would interfere with their right to enjoy the forest; court also noted that plaintiff failed to show specific intent to comment if opportunity to do so was restored, and failed to show a specific plan of any of their 700,000 members to visit a specific site; without concrete injury, no right to sue present and no right to sue simply because some procedural right taken away).