Smith v. Pennock, 2010 MT 192 (Mont. Sup. Ct. 2010)

(plaintiffs have road easement through defendant's property; easement language ambiguous and road easement provided the only reasonably convenient access to building on tract). 

CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.

RSS​ Facebook Twitter