Smith v. Comr., T.C. Sum. Op. 2010-142

(petitioner failed to convince court that his weed-pulling activity at his property that generated tax loss was sufficient to satisfy 750-hour test for purposes of passive loss rules; court checked state highway map and confirmed that property visits petitioner claimed with associated weed-pulling activity were simply not possible). 

CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.

RSS​ Facebook Twitter