Sik v. Verhelst Brothers, et al., No. A09-329, 2009 Minn. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1265 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 8, 2009)

(plaintiff claims that defendant (feedlot and farm) created nuisance by grinding hay in violation of county-issued conditional-use permit and that county's failure to enforce conditional-use permit constituted a taking; inverse condemnation claim fails as a matter of law because government did not physically conduct activity on plaintiff's property or regulate their property; no evidence existed that defendant in violation of conditional use permit; appropriate remedy would be mandamus action against county for failure to enforce conditional use permit and/or private nuisance action against defendant).