Shipe v. Public Wholesale Water Supply District No. 25, 210 P.3d 105 (Kan. Sup. Ct. 2009)

(landowners not holding rights to appurtenant water have standing to object to a temporary easement on their property, but do not have standing to object to condemnation of water rights which they do not possess; question of whether defendant can condemn water rights over plaintiff's property not ripe for decision because plaintiff does not hold water rights and current eminent domain proceeding does not seek a permanent easement for point of diversion).