(personal injury suit involving a collision between plaintiff’s vehicle and two horses from equestrian center in which gate did not work and horses were confined in temporary electric fence; jury returned verdict in favor of plaintiff; court held expert witness’ testimony was speculative and conclusory because it failed to explain how horses escaped or how the alleged failures identified were negligent, so testimony should have been excluded, but error was harmless; court upheld jury’s determination of negligence because defendants testified the lack of a functioning gate allowed horses to escape; court reversed finding of gross negligence which requires an extreme danger and defendants’ knowledge of risk but indifference; evidence showed electric fence had been used for fifteen years without incidence, so no evidence defendants were subjectively aware of risk; court affirmed negligence, but reversed gross negligence claim and ordered plaintiff take nothing on her judgment for that claim).
CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.