Red 11, LLC v. Conservation Commission, 117 Conn. App. 630 (Conn. Ct. App. 2009)

(sufficient evidence present to support defendant's determination that plaintiff violated town's wetland regulations and that exemption for farming activities did not apply).

CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.

RSS​ Facebook Twitter