In re Eiteljorg, 951 N.E.2d 565 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011)

(case invovles dispute between beneficiaries of trust and trustees; trust assets of $6.5 million included in life beneficiary's gross estate; holders of remainder interests sought distribution of $2 million and trustees only wanted to distribute $1 million due to concern that estate could be liable for additional $2 million in federal estate tax; following litigation on matter, trial court ordered $1.5 million be distributed and that trustees had breached fiduciary duty under state (IN) law because they knew that trust corpus was ripe for distribution; portion ripe for distribution still needed to be distributed even though beneficiaries were in dispute over amount to be distributed; appellate court affirmed on fiduciary duty/distribution issue, but reversed on damages issues holding that beneficiaries entitled to interest only on cash portion of court-ordered distribution for period beginning with demand to time of actual payment (less interest or income accrued during timespan); case remanded for determination of compensatory damages plus $150,000 in attorney fees to beneficiaries). 

CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.

RSS​ Facebook Twitter