In re Application of Hennen for Amended Conditional Use Permit, No. A10-2246, 2011 Minn. App. Unpub. LEXIS 909 (Minn. Ct. App. Sept. 26, 2011)

(farmers challenge county’s denial of conditional-use permit (CUP) to expand feedlot, arguing that record did not support findings that expansion would create unreasonable adverse effects due to odor and that use was not compatible with surrounding properties; farmers also argued that county’s decision was unreasonable and record supported grant of limited expansion; appellate court found that record did not support county’s findings and conclusions, and reversed denial of conditional use permit; court remanded with instructions to grant CUP with reasonable conditions that may include specific requirements to be met by farmers before implementation of any incremental increase in animal units).

CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.

RSS​ Facebook Twitter