(plaintiff brought federal case against 42 defendants involved in wind power station development in northern Illinois on land adjacent to plaintiff's land based on twelve theories of recovery couched in state and federal constitutional law and on the common law arising from the numerous problems caused by large-scale wind power stations; court upheld lower court's determination that federal court not proper forum to resolve plaintiff's claims; court also affirmed trial court's denial of defendants' motion for stay of administrative proceedings; plaintiff free to pursue claims in state court).