Molnar v. Comr., No. 8039-R, 2010 Minn. Tax LEXIS 27 (Minn. Tax Court Oct. 19, 2010)

(petitioners, married couple, could not claim business expense losses associated with horse ranch because ranch was operated for recreational purposes; profit intent not present).

CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.

RSS​ Facebook Twitter