Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Holsten, No. A08-2171, 2009 Minn. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1078 (Minn. Ct. App. Sept. 22, 2009)

(plaintiff, environmental activist group, challenged adequacy of environmental impact statement issued by defendant, state Department of Natural Resources involving reactivation of taconite mine and tailings basin on grounds that EIS failed to address impact of reactivation on “climate change” among other things; court affirmed trial court’s validation of EIS because no reliable model of measuring greenhouse gas emissions existed).