- Ag Docket
(defendant's insurance policy that covered theft of cattle; while "theft of cattle" a covered loss under policy, plaintiff argued for non-coverage because cattle were either wrongfully converted or embezzled by defendant's employees who sold them without authorization and pocketed the sale proceeds; ordinary person of usual understanding would not comprehend that all employee "thefts" are "embezzlements"; exclusionary language not clear and policy to be construed in favor of insured; insufficient factual evidence present to determine whether separate deductible should be applied to each separate theft).
CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.