Meinhardt v. Comr., T.C. Memo. 2013-85

(petitioner, an architect, purchased farmland and associated farmhouse in 1976 and rented out the land separate from the farmhouse; attempts to rent the farmhouse were unfruitful and farmhouse never rented for cash; various family members lived in the farmhouse over the years in exchange for improvements made to farmhouse; petitioner claimed deductions associated with the farmhouse which IRS denied; issue before court was whether deductions allowable under either I.R.C. Secs. 212 or 162; petitioners failed to present evidence that they incurred claimed expenses; no deductions allowed under Sec. 162 because petitioner failed to establish existence of real estate rental business; no deduction allowed under Sec. 212 because petitioner failed to establish that farmhouse held for production of income; no evidence that value of services for improvements to farmhouse approximated fair rental value; potential application of I.R.C. Sec. 280A not in issue; accuracy-related penalty not imposed). 

CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.

RSS​ Facebook Twitter