(inverse condemnation action brought nine years ago involving plaintiff's claim that defendant took his leased property by removing bridge used to access northern portion of property; Ninth Circuit held that exclusive jurisdiction rested in U.S. Court of Federal Claims and remanded case for transfer; court denies government's motion to dismiss, but government's motion for summary judgment granted, in part - factual issues remain as to whether legally recognizable property interest exists under the Fifth Amendment such that a taking by loss of access occurred, and as to whether regulatory taking occurred via Penn Central analysis; summary judgment proper for government on plaintiff's claim that Lucas-type categorical taking has occurred).