(defendant appealed misdemeanor cruelty to animals conviction; evidence at trial showed emaciated dogs found running loose near property formerly owned by defendant; jury instruction allowed jury to convict for recklessness when the statute at the time did not permit conviction for anything less than knowing and intentional conduct; defendant did not object to instruction at the time of trial, but court held allowing argument and instruction on recklessness was egregious harm and reversed conviction; dissent argued that defendant did not argue that her conduct was reckless rather than intentional or knowing because she denied charges altogether, so erroneous inclusion of reckless in instruction was not reversible error).