Ingham v. O’Block, et al., 351 S.W.3d 96 (Tex. Ct. App. 2011)

(plaintiffs appeal trial court ruling declaring defendant's property not burdened by easement in favor of plaintiffs; plaintiffs routinely subleased ranch to deer hunters and claimed access right through defendant's property for hunting; plaintiffs assert trial court erred by not finding easement by estoppel, easement by necessity and easement implied from prior use; appellate court affirmed;  insufficient evidence to conclude easement by estoppel (“friendly neighborly permission” to use land not enough); plaintiffs failed to prove historical necessity for easement by necessity; no evidence showing apparent use of road to establish implied easement).