(plaintiff, on behalf of minor children, sued homeowner after homeowner had danced suggestively with the plaintiff’s mother and teased the plaintiff’s father before he shot and killed the mother and himself; summary judgment granted because homeowner owed no duty to plaintiff to protect them from the criminal acts of the father who was a guest in her home; on appeal, court upheld because plaintiff did not have a special relationship with the victims and criminal; homeowner did not have a duty to avoid provoking the father and the court declined to extend a duty to reduce domestic violence by refraining from teasing those who may be potentially violent; court held imposing this duty would impose the duty on domestic abuse victims to prevent their own abuse).