(case involves dispute over ownership of strip of land between adjoining land of parties, and plaintiff's inverse condemnation action against defendant for compensation for taking of portion of disputed area for drainage easement; trial court entered "take nothing" judgment and plaintiff appealed; on appeal, plaintiff's claim to ownership under "strip and gore" doctrine failed because deed clearly described the precise boundary with the disputed strip and conveyed grantor's intent not to convey disputed strip; adverse possession elements not present).