Herbert Farms v. Southern Insurance Co., No. 12-30649, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 25368 (5th Cir. Dec. 12, 2012)

(plaintiff filed claim for loss of rice damaged while in storage during drying process; claim excluded under policy exclusion for damages to contents of “rice drying house”; plaintiff brought suit arguing “rice drying house” was ambiguous; district court granted summary judgment to defendant finding no ambiguity and exclusion applied; on appeal, court affirmed finding the term had an ordinary, prevailing meaning and the court would not create ambiguity where none exists).

CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.

RSS​ Facebook Twitter