Gunnink v. State of Minnesota, et al., No. A09-1835, 2010 Minn. App. Unpub. LEXIS 862 (Minn. Ct. App. Aug. 24, 2010)

(defendants' entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff's claims of abuse-of-process and malicious prosecution based on actions defendants took in furtherance of state law to inspect plaintiff's farm for existence of animal feedlot for possible regulatory action). 

CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.

RSS​ Facebook Twitter