(ruling on summary judgment motion in patent and ownership dispute between produce grower and manufacturer over plastic containers; court denied defendant’s motion that plaintiff lacked standing to revise patent to include inventor who is alter ego of company, plaintiff had ownership interest in action; court rejected laches argument due to lack of evidence from defendant regarding plaintiff’s knowledge of patent; summary judgment granted on plaintiff’s claim of inventive contribution due to lack of evidence presented by plaintiff; summary judgment also granted on plaintiff’s false promises claims to not use invention in other ways due to lack of evidence; plaintiff’s claim of misuse of invention for second generation product without payment or permission may proceed; court also held plaintiff’s knowledge of sale of second generation product meant suit was timely filed; plaintiff precluded from bringing punitive damage claim but other damage claims allowed as evidence permits).