(case involves charge of animal cruelty (horses) against plaintiff and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment; court denies motion on basis that no reasonable jury could conclude that temporary corrals and enclosures were within curtilage of the property based on lack of proximity to home, merely a perimeter fence used (as opposed to privacy fence) and horses clearly visible from pens; seizure of horses did not violate plaintiff's Fourth Amendment rights; no malicious prosecution, no excessive force used, no equal protection violation).