Deere & Company v. New Holland Rochester, Inc., 935 N.E. 2d 267 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010)

(lienholder (via perfected PMSI) in farm equipment entitled to prejudgment possession of equipment in its replevin action; subsequent lienholder merely relied on statements of farmer and third parties that liens in equipment had been satisfied (they had not) rather than contacting lienholder directly; subsequent lienholder had actual notice of plaintiff's prior interest).

CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.

RSS​ Facebook Twitter