Byrd v. Hamer, 943 N.E.2d 115 (Ill. Ct. App. 2011)

(plaintiffs, married couple, who had gambling earnings of for the years at issue and substantially more gambling-related losses, cannot deduct losses not entitled to deduction for gambling losses; taxpayers not engaged in gambling trade or business; taxpayers not devoted full-time to gambling activity). 

CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.

RSS​ Facebook Twitter