- Ag Docket
The plaintiff, a chemical manufacturing plant, discharged dissolved minerals into two tributaries that ultimately flowed into regulated waters. The state (AR) imposed more stringent water quality standards that impacted the plaintiff's discharges and gave the plaintiff three years to comply. The plaintiff, however, filed a third party rulemaking which would allow it to continue the same level of discharges of minerals into the tributaries. The state adopted the plaintiff's proposed revisions and submitted them to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for approval. The EPA rejected the changes on the basis that aquatic life in the downstream regulated waters would not be adequately protected. The trial court upheld the EPA position. On appeal, the court affirmed, upholding the EPA regulations that allowed it to examine downstream waters when evaluating a state's water quality standards and noting that AR's supporting documentation was inadequate. The EPA had a rational basis for adopting the regulations and the EPA's rejection was neither arbitrary nor capricious. Eldorado Chemical Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, No. 13-1936, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15694 (8th Cir. Aug. 15, 2014).
CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.