(case involves claim that defendant's operation of waste disposal facility constituted a nuisance; some evidence existed on the question of whether the CEO and manager actively directed and participated in activities that allegedly created a nuisance so summary judgment as to them not proper; right-to-farm law inapplicable because facility in question not an agricultural facility).
CALT does not provide legal advice. Any information provided on this website is not intended to be a substitute for legal services from a competent professional. CALT's work is supported by fee-based seminars and generous private gifts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material contained on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Iowa State University.