In re Superior Tomato Avocado, Ltd., 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 4398 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Sept. 24, 2012)

(creditor claimed priority of treatment as “trust claim” under PACA; debtor objected that creditor did not comply with PACA requirements so it did not qualify; creditor was not PACA licensee at time of shipment of produce and no additional notice as non-licensee provided as required under federal law; court held substantial compliance (rather than strict compliance) was sufficient for notice requirements under PACA so creditor qualified for trust).