(case involves defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's motion seeking declaratory judgment that restrictive covenants prohibiting subject property to be put to commercial uses or uses that are "offensive, dangerous or obnoxious" to property owners within one mile, were violated based on defendants' use of property and receipt of licenses to install and maintain "antenna farm" on property; motion granted in part and denied in part - plausible claim stated concerning noise problems which violated restrictive covenant, but plaintiff lacks standing to asset claim based on "commercial enterprises" covenant, and plaintiff's due process claim dismissed).